Maybe Uwe Boll Is Right

by David Thomas | 6. April 2009 11:28 | permalink
 
Thanks to wickedly wonderful white magic of Netflix on demand movies and my Roku box, I finally had a chance this weekend to watch Uwe Boll’s satirical masterpiece, Postal.
 
I’ll propobably have my game cred plucked forever from my wallet by angry entertainment cops, but I liked the movie. Yes it was dumb. Yes it was offensive. And yes, sometimes it just kind of meandered. But this is par for the course for most gonzo flicks. They try so hard that it’s almost impossible for them to work on all levels all the time.
  
So, while the movie won’t likely go down on my list of all time favorites, I thought it was a lot better than I expected it to be and at times was truly funny and biting.
Why did I think I would hate it?
 
Like most game players, I only know about the controversy surrounding Boll rather than have taken the time to actually experience Boll for myself. I know that he makes bad movies about videogames. I know this because I read about it on the Internet. And since I love videogames I am supposed to hate Boll.
What struck me the most after chuckling through his oddball satire and below-the-belt laff factory was that maybe gamers hate Boll not because he screws up videogames but because Boll understands videogames all too well.
 
Whenever the game community decides to mash up the art discussion with the game discussion, we end up talking about the Citizen Kane of games, we point to obscure and moving moments in JRPGs that most people have never heard of and keep talking about Katamari Damacy and  No More Heroes as if these games share a tenth of percent of mainstream of game DNA. And then we have our indies, our precious garage-game builders who apparently have been given the role of aesthetic guardians of the  entire industry.
 
But for most of the world and, frankly, most game players outside the hardcore, videogames are testosterone-driven joy fests hinged on shooting straight and driving fast. Maybe  Postal was absurd, violent and unintentionally surreal, then again, so was Gears of War.
 
Really, Boll’s Postal is a mirror that reflects what games are rather than what they could be.
 
I’m not high-minded about this. I like blowing stuff up as much as the next guy. Games can wallow gloriously in the dumb fun that Boll sees in them as much as they want.  I liked Postal for the same reasons that I actually had fun playing Onechanbara. But if we let bikini-clad zombie-slayers have the final word on fun, then maybe we don’t deserve a vision of the medium any less twisted than the one Boll has immortalized.

Currently rated 3.1 by 15 people

  • Currently 3.066667/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: ,

Games

Comments

  • DavidThomas

    4/7/2009 11:34:39 AM

    @Arras:

    I don't know if you are slyly trying to make my argument for me. But I'm not sure what you can do to make the premise, "hot vampire kills Nazis and Nazi vampires while wearing tight leather" any more ridiculous than it already is.

    Remaking the Godfather as a game? OK, that's a topic of conversation. But I'm not sure what holy cannon of storytelling we need to uphold with BloodRayne:)

    Reply »
  • Arras
    Arras

    4/7/2009 11:00:13 AM

    I'm not going to suggest that the stories in video games are Shakespeare-worthy classics and Boll is ruining that.
    What bothers me about him is that he takes perfectly good stories - let's take Bloodrayne for example - and takes a gigantic crap all over them.
    In Bloodrayne, the story was already written for him - hot vampire kills Nazis and Nazi vampires while wearing tight leather. Done, set, print. Instead of that, he makes some horribly written, horribly produced "re-imagining" of her origins. It had potential and he squandered it.
    It's like he intentionally makes video games into bad movies just to piss off gamers. That's why I don't like him, not because the internet told me so.

    Oh and he's also an asshole of epic proportions.

    Reply »
  • ThePimpOfSound
    ThePimpOfSound

    4/6/2009 7:54:20 PM

    @DavidThomas:

    Duh. Should've read the lede. I will watch it over the Xbox 360, thank you very much.

    Maybe you should interview Boll. He may be quite happy to talk about his genius.

    Reply »
  • RyanKuo

    4/6/2009 7:51:31 PM

    That's a fascinating critique of Uwe Boll. It seems like there's a knowingness about the film, which is not something you ever hear about his stuff.

    Reply »
  • DavidThomas

    4/6/2009 7:32:32 PM

    Yup. It's one of their Watch Instantly movies.

    I just watched it via the Roku, a little machine that hooks up to my TV and lets me stream Netflix Watch Now on the TV.

    Let me know what you think of it!

    Reply »
  • ThePimpOfSound
    ThePimpOfSound

    4/6/2009 6:24:32 PM

    Well put. Does Netflix stream this?

    Reply »

Want a new look on the discussion?
» Take It to the Forums

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post.
0 / 2000 used

Log In and Post

Log In and Post

The Chatter Box

  • Recent
  • Active
  • Status
ChknKitty

ChknKitty Says

Wow, people win every day in the Chicken Out contest! Sign up and win.

Xbox 360 | PS3 | Wii | PSP | DS | PC
The Games That Time Forgot

The Games That Time Forgot


The games we're pulling together in this feature won't appear on any of those best-of lists and get confused looks when you mention them in conversation. Just because time has forgotten these titles, though, doesn't mean you should forget them, too.

» Read On

Expand Box

© Crispy Gamer, Inc. All rights reserved.

By continuing past this page, and by your continued use of this site,
you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.