BioWare and sex ... again

by John Keefer | 5. June 2009 18:10 | permalink

You thought they would have learned from the uproar (albeit misplaced) with Mass Effect. But darn it if BioWare hasn't revisited the slippery slope.

For the uninitiated, Mass Effect contained a cutscene where Commander Shepard has an intimate liaison with a member of his party. The scene is tasteful, with only a split-second of anything remotely tawdry being shown. Add to the mix that this scene could be achieved only if certain choices were made at particular points in the game, meaning that many players would not see the scene if they made choices that could hamper the relationship. This did not stop numerous critics, almost all of whom never played the game or bothered to inform themselves about it, from bashing the game and BioWare for exposing players to sex in videogames and decrying the game as a sex simulator.

Fast forward to E3 2009 and the showing of Dragon Age Origins in a private screening room at the EA booth. The developers demoing the game showed off the trailer to build anticipation, then immediately jumped into a part of the game where the player is faced with a choice of advancing a relationship with one of two female characters. Once the female was chosen by the audience, the developers proceeded to make the appropriate choices (three in all) that ended with another sexual liaison between characters. Again, nothing was shown other than the characters in skimpy undergarments, but the images were there, lasting only a few seconds.

The question I'm left with is why would BioWare insist on showing THIS particular sequence, given the unwarranted shellacking it took before? If anything, you would think they would want to downplay it a bit, not titillate further. Dragon Age has plenty going for it without the first scene being shown to E3 viewers having sexual undertones. I sincerely hope the game isn't that shallow. I'm always impressed by BioWare games, but in this case, I am more than a little surprised at how they roleplayed this out.

Currently rated 4.3 by 4 people

  • Currently 4.25/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Tags: , , , ,

E3 Expo 2009 | Games

Comments

  • CG-Prophet

    6/8/2009 6:48:21 PM

    oh and this whole discussion is taking the sex out of context.

    Reply »
  • CG-Prophet

    6/8/2009 6:47:07 PM

    @Shimarenda:

    Showing a small slice of a game to the media is not marketing - we don't work for a marketing firm nor are our members getting ready to run an ad campaign.

    Here's why i am glad they showed this stuff now - instead of hiding it like they did with previous games they are putting it out there for everyone to see.

    To me it's such a non-issue.

    Now if we were talking about why they should have shown something better then i'd probably agree with the original poster..



    Reply »
  • Shimarenda
    Shimarenda

    6/8/2009 5:05:23 PM

    [quote=CG-Prophet]Bioware has been keen on tinkering with the idea of relationships since Bladur's Gate. Sex is part of that relationship and of course what it showed off at E3 is taken out of context - as is the violence it has shown from the game.

    Dragon Age is going to be rated M, why shouldn't it have these things in it, no matter how much it seems like pandering at this early stage? [/quote]
    Sex and violence out of context basically is pandering. They require context in order to determine their meaning within the story being told.

    Even more surprising to me than Bioware's sudden tone-deafness is that they spend the time and money to market this game in this manner, and then seem surprised when people draw conclusions about the product being marketed.

    Reply »
  • CG-Prophet

    6/7/2009 11:31:14 PM

    @JohnKeefer:

    There's so much pandering going on at E3 that it should be called Panderfest 2009. Why should BioWare be the exception?


    Reply »
  • JohnKeefer
    JohnKeefer

    6/7/2009 11:53:25 AM

    @CG-Prophet:

    I'm not saying it shouldn't be in it. It IS part of the relationship dynamic. The point was that BioWare seems to be flaunting it in the face of the controversy with Mass Effect. Are you telling me there was NOTHING else to show that was interesting about the game? I doubt it, so it is either pandering or the game is incredibly shallow. I believe the former.

    Reply »
  • CG-Prophet

    6/7/2009 11:41:37 AM

    @CG-Prophet:

    Note to self - I attributed the sex to the wrong game - point still stands .. for Mass Effect 2.

    Reply »
  • CG-Prophet

    6/7/2009 11:40:33 AM

    Bioware has been keen on tinkering with the idea of relationships since Bladur's Gate. Sex is part of that relationship and of course what it showed off at E3 is taken out of context - as is the violence it has shown from the game.


    Dragon Age is going to be rated M, why shouldn't it have these things in it, no matter how much it seems like pandering at this early stage?

    Reply »
  • Shimarenda
    Shimarenda

    6/6/2009 11:22:03 AM

    Bioware's recent marketing for Dragon Age disturbs me. I am not as disturbed by the content of that marketing, strange as it has been, as I am disturbed by what it seems to indicate about the company's direction. First the Violence trailer, and now this presentation; Laidlaw's comments as reported by Shacknews were embarrassing and repulsive.

    The current attitude coming from Bioware seems to be that if you don't like what they are showing, it's because you're just not up to it. As Chris Priestly said in the forum announcement about the Violence trailer, "*Final Warning * Contains blood. Not for the faint hearted or weak stomached. If you're not tough enough to handle our game, turn back now." They don't seem to conceive that an entire trailer of noncontextualize violence might be objectionable on principle. I attempted to explain this several times in that thread--that I was concerned that they thought the trailer was appropriate or needed--but the only replies from an employee I received were to say that I would be assuaged when they released a future trailer that was more "palatable to you."

    They seem to feel that their old fans will all buy it anyway. And I am sure there is no requirement to play "Bed the Wizard" if one does not want to. But this public emphasis on supposedly mature stuff causes me to question if they have a story I'm interested in experiencing.

    Reply »
  • Shimarenda
    Shimarenda

    6/6/2009 10:48:45 AM

    Reply »

Want a new look on the discussion?
» Take It to the Forums

Leave a Comment

You must be logged in to post.
0 / 2000 used

Log In and Post

Log In and Post

The Chatter Box

  • Recent
  • Active
  • Status
ChknKitty

ChknKitty Says

Wow, people win every day in the Chicken Out contest! Sign up and win.

Xbox 360 | PS3 | Wii | PSP | DS | PC
The Games That Time Forgot

The Games That Time Forgot


The games we're pulling together in this feature won't appear on any of those best-of lists and get confused looks when you mention them in conversation. Just because time has forgotten these titles, though, doesn't mean you should forget them, too.

» Read On

Expand Box

© Crispy Gamer, Inc. All rights reserved.

By continuing past this page, and by your continued use of this site,
you agree to be bound by and abide by the User Agreement.